top of page

Why Our Ears Change


Why do Our Ears Change?


As people age, their earlobes often exhibit signs of aging such as elongation, wrinkling, and volume loss. These changes occur due to several factors including the loss of collagen and elastin, which are proteins that provide structure and elasticity to the skin. Additionally, gravity continuously pulls on earlobes which wear heavy earrings, exacerbating these signs of aging.


To correct aging earlobes, several treatments are available:


1. Injectable Fillers: This is a popular non-surgical option where fillers such as hyaluronic acid are injected directly into the earlobe to add volume and reduce sagging and wrinkling. The effects are temporary, lasting typically around 6 to 12 months before another treatment is necessary.


2. Fat Transfer: This method involves transferring fat from another part of the body to the earlobes. Fat transfer can be an effective way to restore lost volume more permanently compared to synthetic fillers. The procedure involves harvesting fat through liposuction, processing it, and then injecting it into the earlobes. This can help plump up the lobes and make them look younger and fuller.


3. Surgery: For more severe cases, surgical intervention might be necessary. Procedures such as earlobe lift or reduction can help reshape the earlobe, making them appear shorter and more youthful.


Overall, fat transfer does indeed help in correcting the volume loss in earlobes, offering a more natural and long-lasting solution compared to other fillers. It's important for anyone considering these procedures to consult with a qualified plastic surgeon to discuss the best options based on their specific needs and the condition of their earlobes.


Earlobes naturally age along with the rest of the skin, showing signs such as sagging, thinning, and wrinkling due to the loss of collagen and elastin. These proteins are crucial for maintaining the skin's firmness and elasticity, and their degradation over time contributes significantly to the changes in earlobe appearance. Factors like prolonged wearing of heavy earrings can exacerbate these effects by stretching the earlobes further [oai_citation:1,This 10-Minute Treatment Corrects Stretched-Out Earlobes | The AEDITION]( [oai_citation:2,What You Need to Know About Earlobe Rejuvenation](


To counter these aging effects, various treatments are available.


One effective non-surgical option is the use of dermal fillers. Fillers such as hyaluronic acid can be injected into the earlobes to restore volume and improve their overall appearance. This treatment can plump the earlobes, smooth out wrinkles, and even improve the positioning of earrings on the lobe [oai_citation:3,This 10-Minute Treatment Corrects Stretched-Out Earlobes | The AEDITION]( [oai_citation:4,What You Need to Know About Earlobe Rejuvenation]( [oai_citation:5,Fillers For Earlobe Rejuvenation | Schweiger Dermatology Group](

These fillers are relatively safe and can provide immediate results, lasting anywhere from six months to two years before requiring a touch-up.


For those seeking a more permanent solution, surgical options such as earlobe reduction or lift can correct sagging and reshape the earlobe, often in conjunction with other facial rejuvenation procedures [oai_citation:6,What You Need to Know About Earlobe Rejuvenation](


Additionally, preventative measures can help mitigate further aging.  Regular application of sunscreen to the earlobes, choosing lighter earrings, and removing earrings while sleeping are practical steps to preserve the earlobes' youthful appearance [oai_citation:7,What You Need to Know About Earlobe Rejuvenation]( [oai_citation:8,Injectables: How Your Earlobes Might Benefit From Dermal Filler | The Aesthetic Society](


Overall, while aging of the earlobes is natural, the combination of preventive care and treatments like fillers can significantly enhance their appearance and function. The research comparing absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for scar quality provides mixed results.


Here are the key findings from the relevant studies


1. Absorbable versus Non-absorbable Sutures: There is no clear consensus on whether absorbable or non-absorbable sutures are superior for minimizing scar visibility. Some studies report no significant differences in the cosmetic outcomes between the two suture types in various surgical settings including facial, hand, wrist, and carpal tunnel surgeries [(Wade, Wormald, & Figus, 2018)](, [(Gillanders, Anderson, Mellon, & Heskin, 2018)](, [(Goto, Sakamoto, Ganeko, Hida, Furukawa, & Sakai, 2016)](


2. Optimal Timing for Suture Removal: The timing of suture removal is typically determined by the type of suture used and the anatomical location of the wound. There is limited direct evidence comparing outcomes based on different removal times. However, absorbable sutures, which do not require removal, could provide convenience and reduce the need for additional clinical visits [(Wade, Wormald, & Figus, 2018)](


3. Cosmetic Outcomes: Absorbable sutures are generally preferred for their convenience as they do not require removal and have shown comparable cosmetic outcomes in certain types of surgeries, such as facial surgeries [(Gillanders, Anderson, Mellon, & Heskin, 2018)](


Overall, the choice between absorbable and non-absorbable sutures may depend on factors such as surgical site, patient preferences, and specific clinical circumstances, with neither type demonstrating consistent superiority in terms of scar minimization across all studies.


60 East 56th St., #300 • New York, NY 10022

  • Instagram
  • Facebook

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page